Is there a contraction for non-exclusive or?

Question

I find that often, in technical writing, I want to specify that or is non-exclusive: or ≠ xor; or = and/or.

(Stylistically, "and or" is terrible and gets tiresome quickly;)

As an example of the type of ambiguity that can arise, see I need clarification on the use of the word “either”.

If one has established an "xor" in natural language, "or" can be assumed to be non-exclusive can be assumed, but that may not be explicit enough.

Has attempted to introduce, even unsuccessfully, a contraction for "non-exclusive or" that relates symbolically to xor?

--------------------------------------------

Russel & Whitehead used "v" as a symbol.  [See: Symbol for 'Or']

See also: Does “or” mean both conditions?

Jason Bassford · Answer

As far as I know, there is no natural language contraction for the inclusive or.

In fact, in order to make it explicit, you have to write something even longer:

You can choose A, B, or A and B.

But even that may not be explicit enough—because it doesn't absolutely rule out the possibility of not making a choice—or making a choice that isn't any of those things.

If an inclusive choice has be made, then you have to say something like this:

You must choose A, B, or A and B.

Note that this also applies to the natural language equivalent of the exclusive or:

You can choose either A or B, but not both.

Generally, adding just either is enough; however, many people add the extra three words if they want to make sure there is no room for any confusion at all.

And also, in the more explicit version:

You must choose either A or B, but not both.

Is there a contraction for non-exclusive or?

——————————————–

One Answer

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question