English Language & Usage Asked on February 7, 2021
I was taught that there is a difference in the kind of obligation one can express through ‘must’ and ‘have to’. If I say
I must do this.
I imply that I feel an inner urge to do this, whereas if I say
I have to do this.
the obligation is somewhat external, coming from somebody else, not necessarily as an inner conviction.
I am proofreading a book and I must say that in written language I definitely prefer ‘must’ rather than ‘have to’. Yet my friend tells me: ‘If I say must I feel obliged, if I say have to it comes from the heart.’ English is her mother tongue, not mine. I just wonder if my instinct is right. Thank you for your help.
PS: Does not have to sound more spoken language than must?
I am not sure about the exact grammatical meaning of each expression, but in everyday American English, "must" and "have to" are used interchangeably for both internal and external obligations. For example, "To obtain a driver's license, you must be at least sixteen years of age" and "I have to help my friend" both sound correct to me, yet they contradict the usage that you were taught.
Answered by Samuel Erens on February 7, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP