English Language & Usage Asked by CreativeWriting on December 9, 2020
I’ve come across both phrases for quite some time and I can’t seem to distinguish the difference between both of them.
Suzy is biased towards Thomas.
Suzy is biased against Thomas.
In both cases, it is clear that Suzy holds something against Thomas; but what is the difference between “biased towards” and “biased against”? Is it the degree of bias or is it that both are acceptable?
Suzy is biased against Thomas can mean only that she has a prejudice against him. Suzy is biased towards Thomas is ambiguous. It can mean either that her attitude towards him is biased one way or another or that she is biased in favour of him. For that reason, it is perhaps best avoided.
Correct answer by Barrie England on December 9, 2020
I don’t think “biased towards” is ambiguous... Understand the meaning of bias, just google the meaning, read both noun and verb (and carefully read google’s examples under noun and verb). From a metaphorical perspective, bias is a teeter-totter that has a push (which is against) and pull (which is toward). Simple example: I’m biased towards the color blue (I like the color blue); I’m biased against the color red (I dislike the color red).
Answered by Kabilen Mullaithilaga on December 9, 2020
A person who is influenced by a bias is biased. The expression is not “they’re bias,” but “they’re biased.” Also, many people say someone is “biased toward” something or someone when they mean biased against. To have a bias toward something is to be biased in its favor.
Answered by user408008 on December 9, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP