English Language & Usage Asked by prog94 on January 1, 2021
In this sentence I used it to refer to a variety mentioned a few words earlier, because I consider variety to be a collective noun which can be referred to in the singular. However, I’m not certain that the result actually reads that way: is it in my sentence actually referring unambiguously to the variety?
Shop vendors should include a variety of imported products because it solidifies the bond between countries and offers wide range of choice to customers.
No, it's not unambiguous. It can be referring to either a variety or to shop vendors including a variety.
(My personal parsing would be to interpret it as referring to the action rather than to the noun, but that's subjective.)
To rephrase it to make it unambiguous, you have to drop the pronoun.
Here are some possibilities:
Shop vendors should include a variety of imported products because such a variety solidifies the bond between countries and offers a wide range of choice to customers.
Shop vendors should include a variety of imported products because doing so solidifies the bond between countries and offers a wide range of choice to customers.
Note that there is also a third variation of this sentence, one in which the use of it would have been not just ambiguous but inappropriate:
- Shop vendors should include a variety of imported products because these products solidify the bond between countries and offer a wide range of choice to customers.
Answered by Jason Bassford on January 1, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP