English Language & Usage Asked by Some_Guy on June 3, 2021
Disclaimer: I speak British English. I’ve noticed a lot of differences between the way Americans and Brits pronounce numbers.1 Since the question concerns this, I thought it might be appropriate to draw attention to it case we inadvertently confuse each other. My question is not about these differences, I just wish to highlight them in case they cause confusion.
1. You seem to happily call a quarter “a fourth” sometimes,
we always call 131 “one hundred and thirty one”,
we pronounce double digits in phone numbers like 12449 as “one two double four nine”, and
I think we are much more likely to use expressions like “thirteen hundred” to mean 1300.
When talking about fractions, I have frequently heard
1/2 a half
1/3 a third
1/4 a quarter
1/8 an eighth
1/64 a sixty fourth
1/56 a fifty sixth
etc.
Essentially the rule seems to be that, except for “a whole”, “a half”, and “a quarter”, the word matches the ordinal number; that is to say:
Numeral Ordinal Fractional
one first whole
two second half
three third third
four fourth quarter
five fifth fifth
six sixth sixth
fifty-seven fifty-seventh fifty-seventh
Even though 1/4 is a quarter, 1/64 is a sixty-fourth.
So what’s 1/62? A sixty-twoth? A sixty-second? Surely not a sixty-half!
I know that simply saying one over sixty-two can usually work, but I'm asking specifically for the word itself, i.e. if I divide a huge pizza into 21 pieces, what are the pieces? Other than baker’s twentieths.
Summary: Can anyone point me to any sources (whether style guides or common usage studies or anything else) that discuss the pronunciation of fractions; specifically one that discusses this separately from ordinal numbers, rather than how to form ordinal numbers in the first place.
You asked for sources.
thirty-second 2 : the quotient of a unit divided by 32 : one of 32 equal parts of anything <one thirty-second of the total>
The word thirty-twoth does not appear in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, no matter how you spell it. While a few people may use thirty-twoth, it's definitely non-standard.
fourth 2. chiefly North American A quarter: 'nearly three fourths of that money is now gone'
Merriam-Webster has both
fourth : one of four equal parts of something
quarter : one of four equal parts of something
Correct answer by Peter Shor on June 3, 2021
Definitely a sixty-first and a sixty-second as far as I am concerned - no doubt about it. (Mid to South England)
Not that either would come up very often!
Answered by chasly - supports Monica on June 3, 2021
In the US, the general rule is the ordinal form is based on the last element in the numeral.
- sixty-eighth
- one hundred twenty-ninth
- one thousandth
- one thousand-seventh
This does not change when the discussing the denominator of fractions, regardless of whether the numerator is singular or plural
- one thirteenth
- one sixty-first
- three thirty-fourths
- six twentieths
There are exceptions
- first
- second
- third
- fifth (although this seems to be a phonetic morph of fiveth)
- half
- whole
- quarter
The exceptions carry over to more complex ordinals
- sixty-second
- three thirty-thirds
Supplement (based on OP's further comments)
The fractional form, at least in US usage, uses the ordinal form for the denominator with only three (I think) exceptions - whole, half and quarter. And quarter is also regularly expressed as fourth.
Specifically 1/62 is either one sixty-second or a sixty-second. The 21 pizza slices are each one twenty-first of the pie (hardly worth eating!).
As to the footnotes, 131 is either one hundred thirty one or less commonly one hundred and thirty one. If it were the denominator of the fraction 1/131, it would be one one hundred thirty-first.
The pronunciation of multi-digit numbers varies based on what the numbers are used for. Telephone numbers are read differently from monetary numbers or counts of widgets, and there are variations within categories depending on the number (area code 212 is almost always pronounced two one two, rarely two twelve, never two hundred twelve, but area code 800 is read eight hundred). If you want to discuss that issue, it probably warrants a separate question.
Answered by bib on June 3, 2021
Answered by Nicholas Shanks on June 3, 2021
I feel that while "a thirty-second" is a perfectly good way to express 1/32, it's ambiguous and unusual. I would want to add the slightly archaic "part" onto the end: "a thirty-second part of this pizza" etc.
Answered by AmbroseChapel on June 3, 2021
When using fractions in speech, the numerator is properly spoken as a cardinal ("one", "two", "three"). Except in certain cases, the denominator is properly spoken as an ordinal ("third", "fourth", "fifth"). The exceptions are "whole" (one part) and "half" (two parts). There is at least one alternate denominator where "quarter" can be used instead of "fourth".
When speaking numbers in American English, "and" properly indicates a decimal point or the breaking point between the whole and fractional parts of a compound fraction; it doesn't belong anywhere else. British English doesn't have this prescription and practice certainly deviates from this in America as well, introducing the potential for confusion.
In American English, the numeral 131 would properly be read "one hundred thirty-one", though, as you indicated, it would be common to hear it as "one hundred and thirty-one". The fraction 1/131 would be read "one one-hundred-thirty-first", "one over one hundred thirty-one", or "one over one hundred and thirty-one", but "one one-hundred-and-thirty-first" certainly sounds wrong to my ear. The confusion enters when someone says something like "one hundred and thirty-one thousandths": Are we talking about 131/1000 (0.131) or 100-31/1000 (100.031)?
Music is one of the few places where you'll encounter these sorts of fractions anymore because note durations are negative powers of two. Instead of going with a long stream of semi-, hemi-, and demi- prefixes, the ordinal is used in English, so you will encounter:
It's rare to see sixty-fourth notes or one-hundred-twenty-eighth notes, but the language of music certainly allows for it. Note "thirty-second notes": Per the rule, this complies with using the ordinal to speak the denominator.
Answered by Paul Rowe on June 3, 2021
I agree with "chasly from uk" and add that (1) the same applies in the City of London and (2) from "Dizionario di Inglese - Volume Secondo - Italiano-Inglese (Paravia 2002, but originally Oxford University Press 2001): 21° = twenty-first, 22° = twenty-second, 31° = thirty-first, 32° = thirty-second, etc.
Answered by alsa on June 3, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP