English Language & Usage Asked by YHSPY on September 27, 2021
I have below two sentences; how should I choose from these two in a conversation? It seems to me that when we talk about the person (him), since he is not here at the time of the conversation, and thus that the fact I states cannot be a realistic one, I should use "Subjunctive Mood", right? If so, what is the correct situation for the first sentence, namely the "If – Adverbial clause of condition", this one should be used in an achievable situation, right? But, every situation in which this one can be used is the fact, that the person "him" is not there at that moment which is contradictory to the usage of "If – Adverbial clause of condition".
If he comes, he will tell me all the facts.
If he came, he would tell me all the facts.
As pertains to your first sentence, here (British Council: Verbs in time clauses and 'if' clauses) is an explanation of the principles to observe. It is a correct sentence, but the mood is not the subjunctive, it is the indicative (present). It doesn't matter whether the person you are talking about is absent or present.
The second is not correct from a certain point of view (mixed conditional) otherwise it is correct (conditionals) . Here is the other form.
The difference between the two sentences—once corrected—is that the first relates to facts concerning the future, whereas for the second it is the past. You use "would" (ref.) for the past.
The new sentence, after the correction
The subjunctive past (came) , according to some terminology, is used to state a hypothesis in the present and the near future (If he came now, or a little later…). The use of "would" is modal; it is meant to express a predictions or "refers to unreal or improbable present or future situations" (ref.).
Correct answer by LPH on September 27, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP