English Language & Usage Asked on February 24, 2021
First off, I do not believe this question is a duplicate of this one:
What is the correct punctuation when quoting a question in the middle of a larger sentence?
I want to know how to insert a complete quote in the middle of a sentence where the quote must be immediately followed by a comma while also preserving the punctual tone (ie, whether or not it’s imperitive, declarative, interrogatory, or exclamatory). Here’s an example:
Before you walk into a room full of glum-looking people and ask, “Who died?”, you should make sure there’s not a casket present.
I think there are some who will argue that there is too much punctuation in my example. I disagree, however. There should always be consistency in any linguistic construct. Arbitrarily eliminating crucial punctuation on the grounds that there’s simply too much of it is a bad call.
That said, I chose to keep the question mark and add a comman after "Who died?"
. If I say "Who died,"
, the interrogatory tone has to be assumed by the reader which is not guaranteed. Preserving the question mark forces the tone of the sentence which gives the writer more control over how it is received by the reader.
There are several alternatives if you want to retain the quotation marks and question mark, which I list here in shortened form:
- Before you walk into a room and ask, "Who died?", you should ...
- Before you walk into a room and ask "Who died?", you should ...
- Before you walk into a room and ask, "Who died?" you should ...
- Before you walk into a room and ask "Who died?" you should ...
The basic form is "Before you do X, you should do Y," which means that the comma before you is necessary to separate the clauses and (3) and (4) can be rejected.
Version 1 has a comma before the reported speech; that's standard form. Here, though, it is probably not necessary because the "Who died?" is so closely tied to the first half of the sentence that it doesn't need to be set off from it. There is also the possibility that the first comma could be interpreted as the end of the first clause [whereas it is in fact the second comma], or that the quotation between the two commas is a parenthetical insertion.
I prefer version 2.
If the quotation ended in a full stop and not a different mark, then it would suffice to omit it altogether and simply use the clause-separator:
Before you walk into a room and say "You look sad", you should ...
It is worth considering a further alternative:
Before you walk into a room and ask who died, you should ...
This doesn't use reported direct speech, it reports the activity and describes the situation. It's left to the reader to imagine the scene and the intonation. Do you really need to put that in the writing? Perhaps this is straying into the territory of writing advice.
Answered by Andrew Leach on February 24, 2021
I would say version 1, but it looks funny to see the coma after the question mark and quotation mark. But I guess it's OK.
Answered by user277668 on February 24, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP