English Language & Usage Asked by user69222 on June 11, 2021
This question may seem to be very simple, but something I get confused whenever I want to speak.
I read a book entitled “re-start your English”, and saw a sentence.
This is a leg. It is part of your body.
This is a neck. It is ‘a’ part of your body.
Why didn’t they use ‘a’ in the first sentence?
And why did they use one in the second one?
I’m not a native, so I hope you will please understand,
even if there’s something awkward about my question.
When part is used without the article it has the meaning of section or segment - it is less than the whole object.
A part has the meaning of a specific sub unit. It normally isn't used for something which isn't an identifiable thing all by itself (though just to be confusing sometimes it is.)
Answered by curiousdannii on June 11, 2021
Generally, you can use either.
'My arm is part of my body' and 'My arm is a part of my body' are both everyday uses to native English speakers. They mean more or less the same thing. There is a slightly nuanced difference in meaning but one which even a very experienced speaker would find it difficult to explain. So I wouldn't worry about that.
I presume in your first example it is meant to read 'This is a leg. It is part of your body'.
Do remember always to start a sentence with a capital letter. You will see that I have extensively edited the OP, but I didn't interfere with the sentence examples you gave.
Answered by WS2 on June 11, 2021
Use "part" when it is not meaningful without the rest of the whole; use "a part" when it is meaningful and combines with other meaningful parts of the same whole. For instance: A leg is part of my body; but This item is a part of my collection.
Answered by Mike Grosser on June 11, 2021
If you say "Money is part of the American Dream", you mean that both ideas are strongly linked together. If you said "Money is a part of the American Dream", it would mean that money is only a part of the American Dream. You would focus on just one part as opposed to the rest. The second solution is grammatically correct but seems awkward as it would be dificult to find a context in which it fits.
Answered by user68188 on June 11, 2021
I'm not a native too but i took this years ago in my English class We use part to describe something that don't have value or use alone without the whole combination or when the whole combination can still be with benefit without this part (as your leg) "A part" to describe something that have value alone and can be of benefit alone without the whole combination ,like a doctor in his staff, or when describing a part that the whole combination won't have any benefit without (as the neck) Some people live without a leg, but none lives without a neck
Answered by Jo Elsakka on June 11, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP