English Language & Usage Asked by anubis212 on February 17, 2021
Ok so I’ve always faced a certain level of confusion regarding the conjugaison of the word “would“ when it comes down to some of its specific uses under various tense conditions.
For instance, the other day I had someone (a native speaker) throw the following sentence at me:
“I would take a shot if he fell asleep during the debate“
Please just don’t ask me what this sentence is referring to ?
So basically my question is why did he match “would” with the past simple tense of fall (fell) if the action he was describing was referring to something that was about to take place in the future? Why not simply use the 3rd person singular present tense (falls)?
I obviously had no problem understanding what he meant, but I struggled to grasp the reason behind his choice of verbs as the actions he was referring to were occurring at different moments in time and hence matching the tense made zero sense to me.
Would really appreciate if someone could clarify this for me. Cheers
It's common to use past tense in conditional clauses. "if he fell asleep" is equivalent in meaning to "if he were to fall asleep".
It's not ambiguous because the tense of the main clause makes it clear whether you're talking about the past or future. If you say
I would have taken a shot if he fell asleep.
it's clear that you mean the past, because "would have taken" is the past tense.
Answered by Barmar on February 17, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP