English Language & Usage Asked on November 21, 2020
They do not hesitate in bending the truth however they see fit to
their cause. At times they are rigorous and precise; at times they
just play dumb.
versus
They do not hesitate in bending the truth however they see fit to
their cause: At times they are rigorous and precise; at times they
just play dumb.
Am I correct that both the above sentences are acceptable, and the choice boils down to preference?
Preference aside, what arguments can be put forward to choose one over another? (For example one can argue that if separate sentences make complete sense it should be preferable because long sentences are harder to read, etc.)
Eventually it is a matter of preference. In your example I would prefer the second version (with the colon), as the two sentences are logically linked.
The first sentence establishes a behaviour (bending the truth), and the second then provides examples for this (being rigorous/playing dumb). Using the colon makes this relationship more explicit. Using a full stop here would signal that the two are not necessarily linked.
Answered by Oliver Mason on November 21, 2020
An actual verb is probably more comprehensible to the reader than a gerund or participle:
"They do not hesitate to bend the truth to their cause, however they see fit: At times they are rigorous and precise; at times they just play dumb."
I would prefer a colon here to help indicate that the subsequent phrases (linked by the semicolon) are both dependent on—and subordinate to—the initial phrase.
Answered by Just Some Guy on November 21, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP