English Language & Usage Asked by Felipe Sabino on April 3, 2021
The dictionary for accuracy says:
- The quality or state of being correct or precise.
- The ability to perform a task with precision.
And for precision:
- The quality, condition, or fact of being exact and accurate.
- Marked by or adapted for accuracy and exactness
Are these nouns interchangeable? If not, how to decide whether to use one or another?
The Wikipedia article explains the difference in the best way possible:
In the fields of science, engineering, industry and statistics, the accuracy of a measurement system is the degree of closeness of measurements of a quantity to that quantity's actual (true) value. The precision of a measurement system, also called reproducibility or repeatability, is the degree to which repeated measurements under unchanged conditions show the same results. Although the two words can be synonymous in colloquial use, they are deliberately contrasted in the context of the scientific method.
High accuracy, but low precision:
High precision, but low accuracy:
Correct answer by RiMMER on April 3, 2021
In non-technical usage:
In science and engineering:
In statistics, these both have very particular technical meanings in the context of 2 by 2 contingency tables:
Answered by Mitch on April 3, 2021
Having read RiMmer's excellent distinction, I'd say that, outside science, these words are sometimes interchangeable, but not always; where they are contrasted, I believe the distinction often hinges on intention (focus/method: precision) versus result (success/failure: accuracy).
If you are precise, you display attention to detail as much as you can, i.e. you do your best within the limited range of your abilities to be precise. But whether you are successful may also depend on other factors beyond your power.
Embroidering cushions is very precise work.
Work can only be precise: accuracy wouldn't be quite appropriate, because failure is hardly relevant or even possible. A good result is taken for granted, because it is well within one's abilities to succeed.
She calculated precisely how much sulphur she would need according to the formula to make gold.
She does what she can; but will she make gold? This sentence says nothing about success or failure.
If you are accurate, you produce results that are close to your target; whether you tried hard and did your best is irrelevant.
She calculated accurately how much sulphur she would need to make gold.
This implies that she successfully calculated how much sulphur she needed.
Your prediction of 1–2 % economic growth was accurate, imprecise though it was. You were right; but next time please provide a more precise estimate.
This is not to say that they always differ on this point; sometimes they are equivalent; and sometimes precision isn't so much about intention as it is a neutral opposite to blurred or general. But I do believe accuracy is mostly about result.
Answered by Cerberus_Reinstate_Monica on April 3, 2021
3.14 is accurate, 3.1111111111111111 is precise, 3.14159265 is both
Answered by cindi on April 3, 2021
Is this a fair response? - I've seen people put up Powerpoint Slides suggesting the market for say, tablet computing devices, will be $527,658,749 by the year 2015. While that number looks pretty precise, it certainly won't be accurate. This is an important distinction that exemplifies these two words are not synonyms (even when I see some dictionaries offering them to be)
Answered by JTP - Apologise to Monica on April 3, 2021
I surprised nobody added picture of all 4 possibilities! Picture from St Olaf College.
Answered by Nai on April 3, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP