English Language & Usage Asked on January 17, 2021
The sentence below is from the piece Udder Madness written for The New Yorker by Woody Allen. I take it that Woody is no linguist and so it surprised me a good deal to light upon such a "complex" sentence from a non-linguist. I tend to believe one must have a certain level of proficiency to write such sentences.
What exactly is happening here? I can’t make head nor tail of this sentence as far as its syntax and grammar are concerned. The sentence reads
That’s why when included in last week’s A-list was a writer-director in cinema with a long list of credits although I was unfamiliar with the titles I anticipated a particularly scintillating Labor Day.
I would appreciate any help. Thanks!
This sentence is really not that different from
That’s why when she smiled although I was sad I smiled too.
It could do with some commas, which becomes clear in the shorter version. All I have done is substitute:
Grammatically, the only thing making it complicated is using long phrases without any parentheses or commas to help you identify the sort of nesting in the sentence.
If I put commas in the short version:
That’s why, when she smiled, although I was sad I smiled too.
I can try putting the same commas in the long one:
That’s why, when included in last week’s A-list was a writer-director in cinema with a long list of credits, although I was unfamiliar with the titles I anticipated a particularly scintillating Labor Day.
And I think that makes it more readable.
Correct answer by Kate Gregory on January 17, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP