English Language Learners Asked by Elizabeth on October 1, 2021
The overarching question guiding my research is how the societal development of human society changes the natural environment, as the answer to the question is the key to protect nature.
The question – how does societal development affect the natural environment – has always underpinned my research, and I believe that research shedding light on this question is key to finding the answer to protecting nature
I wrote the first one, and my friend rephrases it to the second one. But I can’t tell the differences. Can you help me to understand why the second one is better than the first one?
The second sentence is not better than the first. It is convoluted and difficult to parse. It also adds verbiage and information that was never in the first sentence to start with.
If I were to edit the first sentence, I might turn it into something like the following:
The overarching question that guides my research is how human social development affects the natural environment. Understanding the impact of humans on nature is key to protecting it.
Unlike the second version in the question, this version actually shortens the wording, making it more concise. It also breaks it into two sentences, rather than trying to fit it all into a single (longer) sentence.
Correct answer by Jason Bassford on October 1, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP