English Language Learners Asked by hatano yui on December 14, 2021
I had neither kith nor kin in England, and was therefore as free as air — or as free as an income of eleven shillings and sixpence a day will permit a man to be. Under such circumstances I naturally gravitated to London, that great
cesspool into which all the loungers and idlers of the Empire are
irresistibly drained.
It is not quite clear to me what “gravitated to London” means. The rest of the sentence isn’t particularly clear either. Please explain.
I would submit that the first part of the statement is a self-justification for indulging in the life-style of the idle. He stipulates that he has no purpose in life. Why not join the flow?
Answered by user28058 on December 14, 2021
The author is saying that as a free person with minimal responsibility, he was attracted to London with all the good and bad adventures London had to offer, but hinting at the darker side of life.
gravitated to London
means attracted to, drawn to, the author is saying these types of people naturally and move towards this destination (London) just as gravity is a natural (an irresistible) force
that great cesspool
A cesspool is a pool (or pond) of human waste (both solid and liquid), referring to something as a cesspool means it has undesirable qualities, in this case there is a moral context
loungers and idlers
refers to types of people that are socially undesirable, those that do nothing and do not contribute to society
of the Empire
refers to the once mighty English Empire(commonly referred to post the Acts of Union as the British Empire) of which London was (and still is) its capital and largest city
irresitibly drained
Draining is a process driven by gravity, "draining water from a bathtub". It means the undesirable people are removed from other parts of the geographically spread Empire and drained into (or concentrated into) London. In this usage irresitible means can not be stopped.
The author is saying that London, being the major city of the Empire, attracted many different types of people especially undesirable ones, as any major city in the world still does. Please keep in mind this is a picture of a Dickensian London. The author's attraction for adventure is as a moth to a flame.
Answered by Peter on December 14, 2021
There are two metaphors here.
Metaphor One
The narrator had no reason to settle down anywhere: he had no family and no friends. He had a small income that allowed him to spend as much time as he liked without looking for a job. He had nothing to do. The implication here is that he was, at that point of his life and career, a drifter: moving around without purpose, like a rogue asteroid in interstellar space.
A large space object - like a planet or a star - can attract such an asteroid, which will thereupon gravitate towards it. In the British Empire, London is that planet (or star) for all drifters.
Metaphor Two
The second metaphor compares London to a cesspool: an underground storage space into which all kinds of waste is drained. Loungers and idlers are being compared to waste drained into a cesspool, and London to a cesspool. This view is complimentary neither to idlers nor London, but it was very popular among England's upper middle class towards the end of the 19th Century: the very group that was to constitute the vast majority of Sir Arthur's readers.
Answered by Ricky on December 14, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP