Earth Science Asked by Tom Haywood on December 12, 2020
Trying to understand this question, posted to me by a lecturer at University:
“The Medieval Climatic Anomaly was distinctive in terms of the
prevailing climates and forcing mechanisms operating at the regional scale.”
Critically evaluate this comment using case-studies to support your answer
Is this statement saying that the MCA was caused only by the prevailing climate and mechanisms operating on a regional scale?
If so what is an example of a regional scale forcing mechanism?
Distinctive in this case means, does not match well with the first abut is explained by the later. This is not the greatest sentence format, but distinct means stands out from. Generally when you refer to something as distinct with respect to X, then it means X is the odd part about it or it stands out from X. In this cased becasue they are talking about a predictive model and the thing being predicted, then it means it is odd because it does not fit the predictions of the prevailing climate model. BUT it is also distinct becasue it is better explained by local factors, for a given value of "local", which is not normally the case for an event so large. It also might be a reference to more recent research showing the anomaly is likely not global. Combining these two slightly different usages is not great sentence composition but is grammatically correct.
In this particular case the regional forcing mechanism is believed to be a large volcano erupting.
Answered by John on December 12, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP