Can absolute or relative contributions from X be calculated for a multiplicative model? $log{ y}$ ~ $log {x_1} + log{x_2}$

One way I can think of is the following (beware that relative importance can mean different things and be counted in different ways):

The relative contribution of log-log model, seen as a linear model, is found by setting everything else to zero and taking the ratio:

Sp:

$$1/r_{x_1} = frac{beta_1 log x_{1}}{log y}$$

or:

$$log y approx r_{x_1} beta_1 log x_1$$

so the relative contribution of the multiplicative model can be derived from:

$$y approx x_1^{r_{x_1} beta_1}$$

$$m_{x_1} = x_1^{r_{x_1} beta_1}/y$$

One can even use the original variable and its exponent as:

$$m_{x_1} = x_1^{beta_1}/y$$

Still another way to quantify importance for multiplicative models (inspired by geometric means) is:

Given $y = ax_1^{beta_1}x_2^{beta_2} cdots x_n^{beta_n}$, then:

$$m_{x_k} = frac{x_k}{sqrt[beta_1 + beta_2 cdots + beta_n]{y}}$$

So if $y = x^2$ then $m_x = 1$ since $x$ has $100$% importance on $y$.

Is there a standard way to make the relative contributions add to unity? Or alternatively, to make the absolute contributions to add to y?

When one wants to determine the percent a certain variable affects another variable, one uses a ratio between the two variables. Only for linear additive models do the percents add up to the original value. For multiplicative models these two properties of relative importance diverge and require different approaches (what I explicitly mentioned in the beginning).

So a percent of $x_k$ over $y$ is always some ratio like $frac{x_k}{y}$ on the other hand for multiplicative models these ratios no longer can be added and don't add up. So one will have to modify their requirements, for example instead of adding up to original value, maybe the product equals the original value.

In this sense one can do a variation of the above proposals (eg the geometric mean inspired formula) and use:

$$y = x_1^{beta_1} cdots x_n^{beta_n}$$

$$m_{x_k} = frac{x_k^{beta_k}}{y^{frac{beta_k}{beta_1+cdots+beta_n}}}$$

With this definition of relative importance one still uses a ratio (so percent of importance of some value on some other value) while at the same time the product of all $m_{x_k}$ equals $1$, or:

$$m_{x_1} cdots m_{x_n} = 1$$

Some references which follow another route:

1. Looking for relative contribution of log and standard variables

2. How do you find contribution of an independent variable in the given log-log regression model?

Measures of relative importance:

1. Quantifying the Relative Importance of Predictors in Multiple Linear Regression Analyses for Public Health Studies
2. Quantifying relative importance: computing standardized effects in models with binary outcomes
3. Relative Importance Analysis: A Better Way to Communicate Multiple Regression Results
4. Investigating the Measures of Relative Importance in Marketing Research