Computer Science Asked on December 26, 2021
If we are using numbers and letters, there are $36^{10}$ unique combinations. Collision is already unlikely, but I need it to be impossible, so using hashing is out of the picture(?).
The use-case is users redeeming each one if they have been “activated” as redeemable. Think like Webkinz codes.
An inefficient solution would be to generate all of them at once, have a property on each saying whether it has been activated or not and keep a pool of those that have been redeemed and those that haven’t.
Keeping a database of $36^{10}$ codes just because I can’t come up with a clever algorithm is pissing me off, so I’m here for your help.
Any ideas?
Here is a process to hand out unique codes, without requiring any storage or memory:
Step 1. Use format-preserving encryption to define a block cipher that maps an integer from ${0,1,dots,36^{10}-1}$ to an integer from ${0,1,dots,36^{10}-1}$.
Step 2. Pick a secret key for this block cipher.
Step 3. The $i$th code you hand out will be the encryption of $i$ under your secret key. Now you only need to store a counter with the largest value of $i$ you have used so far.
To keep track of which codes have been redeemed, you need storage proportional to the number of codes redeemed. So, store a list of codes that were previously redeemed, or use a bitmap, or use any other data structure. There's no way to avoid that much storage.
Answered by D.W. on December 26, 2021
$36^{10}$ is approximately 52-bit. Now;
Since AES with a key selects permutation for all possible permutations from $2^{ell}$ to $2^{ell}$, where $ell$ with a key, then by fixing a key, you fixed a secret permutation. Therefore the output is distinct for every distinct input. It is unpredictable since AES is assumed to be secure against Known-Plaintext Attacks.
Answered by kelalaka on December 26, 2021
You could use a bitmap. Map the values to some sort of numerical order and then use that number as a map the proper bit. The first int (assuming 32-bit and unsigned) would store values 0-4,294,967,295 the second int would store 4,294,967,296 - ... and so on. Even with some overhead this should all easily fit into 10 MB and lookup/setting values is quick since you know the size beforehand and everything can be done with bit manipulation.
Once you get a code in you check if that bit has been set to 1, if not then its valid and you set that bit to 1.
Answered by user28347823048762309478230947 on December 26, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP