Computational Science Asked on February 3, 2021
I have quite a lot of experience solving unsteady Euler equations, including multi-component ones, with in house-coded finite-difference and finite-volume methods, including MacCormack and MUSCLE schemes and WENO flux reconstruction. Now I’m considering "upgrading" to laminar NS equations for compressible gases (i.e. without any turbulence model).
Is it generally considered a hard switch? What are the most complex parts to understand/implement regarding the difference between Euler and NS equations?
What would be the simplest way to incorporate viscosity in FV formulation? Same question with FD formulation.
What would be the simplest way to incorporate diffusion and heat conductivity?
In general, I’m looking for some good detailed literature/tutorials for NS equations similar to LeVeque’s books (which are only for Euler equations, as far as I know).
EDIT: added info about compressible equations and comment on "laminar" term as Spencer Bryngelson suggested in comment.
Use the alpha-damping formulation for the viscous fluxes, very simple to implement.
Answered by EMP on February 3, 2021
Generally the step from compressible Euler equations to the Navier-Stokes equations is not that hard, at least the coding part.
Regards
Answered by ConvexHull on February 3, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP