Biology Asked on April 19, 2021
https://www.newsweek.com/women-are-better-athletes-men-study-about-gender-fitness-says-736047 is the source that I use. Is it reliable?
Why did men and women evolve that way? What’s the evolutionary advantage to women being naturally more fit?
Does childcare and gathering fruit require being athletic? I would have thought that hunting animals and fighting enemies would require being athletic.
So, how did natural selection favor women that are more naturally fit and not favor men that are naturally fit?
It is incredibly hard to know for sure which evolutionary preasuress in our past led to specific taits we see today - in completly different enviroment - but my bet is on surviving childbirth in prehistoric conditions. Also note that women used to spend significant portion of their adult life pregnant, and so any form of resistance to exhaustion would be quite benefitial for them.
Some sources:
... increased aerobic fitness was associated with shorter labor in nulliparous women who started labor spontaneously.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1080/00016340903093583
... moderate-intensity exercise performed throughout pregnancy was associated with a reduction in the rate of cesarean, instrumental deliveries...
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/14767058.2012.696165
Answered by BagiM on April 19, 2021
There doesn't seem to be anything wrong with the paper, but as pointed out in the comments (and in the press release itself), the study was small, so any conclusions should probably be tentative. Adding a little more detail from the link:
For the study, which was very small, researchers recruited nine young males and 9 females, all roughly in their mid-20s. Females and males were of similar weights within their own genders. Everyone participated in the same exercise—walking on a treadmill—and scientists compared oxygen consumption and extraction in both genders during the workout. They found that the women were consistently more efficient than men, as they processed oxygen 30 percent faster.
Beltrame, Thomas, Rodrigo Villar, and Richard L. Hughson. “Sex Differences in the Oxygen Delivery, Extraction, and Uptake during Moderate-Walking Exercise Transition.” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 42, no. 9 (2017): 994–1000.
A few more details from the paper itself:
The greater maximal aerobic power [VO2max] of men compared to women is well recognized (Cureton et al. 1986).
For example, "good" VO2max for 20-29 year old males is 42.5-46.4 mL/kg/min: for 20-29 year old females it's 33.0-36.9 mL/kg/min. This means that at peak intensity, men can process oxygen faster than women.
Here's Figure 2 from the paper:
based on the figure and on table 1, the "mean response time" is about 50 seconds for women, 60 seconds for men.
Finally, it would be hard to be do much evolutionary speculation for the reasons behind these sex differences ... one might want to start by doing a comparative study, to find out if these differences are unique to humans or whether they also appear in our close relatives (chimps, gorillas, etc.)
Answered by Ben Bolker on April 19, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP