Bicycles Asked on August 12, 2021
Sometimes I ride in the park which has no light. There always are dog walkers, runners and other cyclists.
So, when I ride towards someone I have two options:
So, the question is: how to be less irritating?
Consider how you feel when a fellow cyclist approaches you will full beam straight ahead. It's pretty blinding, even for a moment, and especially off-road when your eyes aren't used to it.
So in a park:
If you do this then it doesn't matter whether you illuminate pedestrians or for how long.
Correct answer by PeteC on August 12, 2021
You can dip the light slightly (point it towards the ground). Even without considering politeness, you might prefer to illuminate the ground ahead of you, instead of (as you would on a lit city street) pointing it straight forward to be seen as maximum distance.
Answered by ChrisW on August 12, 2021
I had to face exactly this on an old commute. Dipping the front light was absolutely necessary in a park and another stretch of unlit bike path. It was a bright enough light to illuminate the road, though not well enough to ride at any decent rate on low power.
The solution I found to this was to add a narrow-beam head torch. This can be dipped hands free, and points where you look rather than where the bars are pointing (quite useful when it's pitch dark and you're next to a lake going round sharp bends). Overhanging branches can mean the need to illuminate stuff that's not the road surface, so I tended to adjust the light as I rode much as you'd switch from main beams to dipped beams in a car.
The head torch I bought was ~5 from dealextreme, and is 150 lumens nominal -- so not very much ligfht in total. But all that light is in a bike-sized area of road even if it's directed 10 bike lengths away. I tended to adjust the angle such that I had to tip my head slightly up to illuminate as far away as I'd like for ~30km/h speeds on imperfect tarmac, so that a natural head position was more suited to slower speeds with other people around. In busy areas well-lit I could easily point it almost straight down.
Answered by Chris H on August 12, 2021
There are now many bike lights on the market which have a shaped beam with a "horizontal cutoff" giving strong light onto the road or path, but much less above the horizon. When adjusted correctly these allow you to see where you're going without dazzling oncoming traffic or pedestrians.
I use a Busch & Muller Ixon IQ (pictured), but there are others.
If you don't want to fork out for a new light, you can make a hood for the light to block the light from going upwards.
Answered by James Bradbury on August 12, 2021
I wear an adjustable head strap flashlight at night while riding my bike. The one I have has three colors (white, red and green)which allows me to use a less intense color at times, so as not to blind people. As an addition to three colors, of has three level of intensity. It is worth looking into. With this you are able to turn your head slightly when needed.
These examples may be of help to you. The one pictured is the style I use at the moment.
Answered by Ken Graham on August 12, 2021
In case you can read German, here's a nice explanation how to adjust the bike front light.
Summary:
make sure that the upper rim of the light at 5m distance (wall) is below that height.
Official German regulation: center of light beam should be at half height at 5 m distance = should hit the road at 10 m distance
Adjust speed according to visible range (just like when driving a car)
Answered by cbeleites unhappy with SX on August 12, 2021
how to be less irritating?
By not using a light that is illegal in Germany.
Cheap lights are almost always:
These cheap lights are excellent in blinding oncoming people. The only possibility you can see forward is to direct the brightest part of the beam far away in the road. This means a large portion of the spherically symmetric pattern is projected above the horizon, blinding oncoming riders.
However, the cheap lights are usually poor for seeing because the beam pattern is not designed for vehicle use. The spherical pattern directs too much light where not needed and too little light where needed.
The Germans have a solution for this: their law, StVZO, requires lights to be non-blinking, powered by a power source that doesn't suddenly go away (=dynamo), and the beam pattern to be such that it lights the road ahead of the cyclist and only the road ahead of the cyclist, having a sharp cut-off at the beam to not direct any part of the bright beam above the horizon (there will be still plenty of spill light that won't blind others but allows car drivers to see there's a bike).
Unfortunately quality costs. Only about 1% of people live in Germany, so pretty much the Germans are designing lights only for 1% of the population. If a German quality headlight manufacturer can amortize the product development costs of a true vehicle headlight over 1% of cyclists in this planet and a Chinese manufacturer can amortize the product "development" (in quotes because reusing flashlight technology doesn't really require any intelligent work) costs of a flashlight over 99% of cyclists in this planet, guess which light will be more expensive and which will be less expensive?
Answered by juhist on August 12, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP