Bicycles Asked on June 16, 2021
Some shifter designs have become known for causing broken cables, anecedotally because they’re causing too much repeat spooling and unspooling over too tight a radius. For example, broken cable heads inside some STI generations is a well-known occurrence.
Other shifters have more cable movement but don’t have those issues, a common example being the 1:1 shifters where replacement is done by lifting the cover off the shifter.
How do you design a shifter and stay on the right side of this?
How do you design a shifter and stay on the right side of this?
You don't.
You design a shifter that with repeated use breaks the cable. Then you expect the user to change the cable whenever it breaks, limping home without gear shifting function if the cable fails during a ride.
David Gordon Wilson has written a text about cable fatigue. According to it, the diameter ratio should be 72 for long life and 42 at a minimum. With 1.2 mm gear cable, it means 50.4 mm diameter or 25.2 mm radius at a minimum. Bicycle shifters have a far tighter cable bending radius.
The reason this works is because shifting is not safety critical in the manner brakes are. Bicycle brakes too have small bending radii in their cable path, but not as tight as shifters. In brakes, some design effort is needed to not immediately fatigue the cable. The brake cables still fail despite this.
Answered by juhist on June 16, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP