TeX - LaTeX Asked by needle on April 21, 2021
I am trying to make a Fibonacci macro, that works as follows.
I was able to do so, and I tried to make everything private by using @
(i know it isn’t necessary here, but I am trying to practice…). I know that @curtab
is supposed to be used for tabs, but since I saw @David Carlisle use it for other things, I tried to do the same.
Here is the code that I wrote
begin{document}
makeatletter
renewcommandfib[2][]{newcountprint@limit newcount@limit
expandafterifxexpandafterrelaxdetokenize{#1}relax %no input#1
print@limit=#2%
else
print@limit=#1%
fi
@tempcnta@ne @tempcntb@ne count@#2 @limittw@
ifnumprint@limit<tw@ number@tempcntb, fi
fib@i}
deffib@i{%
ifnumcount@>@ne
print@fib
@curtab=numexpr@tempcnta+@tempcntbrelax
@tempcnta@tempcntb @tempcntb@curtab
advancecount@-@ne advance@limit@ne
fib@i
fi}
defprint@fib{%
unlessifnum@limit<print@limit%
number@tempcntb%
ifnumcount@>thr@@ , %
elseifnumcount@=thr@@ ~and %
fififi}
makeatother
end{document}
It works just fine, and i even made it a bit better by changing the last print to m AND n
instead of m, n
.
My problem is that i wasn’t able to define fib
using def
, and had to resort to using newcommand
because i couldn’t figure out how to get the optional argument using def
.
def
and get an optional argument?ifnum>3 , ifnum=3 and
, so that i get the correctloop ... repeat
, i defined fib@i
which acts like a loop
. However, i was wondering if it is betterYou should not allocate two new counters every time the macro is used (classic tex only has 256 counters, etex has more but still, ...)
If you do use counters you should allocate them just once, outside of the macro, and also whatever dubious example you may have seen elsewhere allocate your own counter do not re-use @curtab
The question whether to use a loop or recursion doesn't really have an answer, as loop
is simply a recursive macro, there is no looping primitive in TeX.
I'd probably do something like this (which would be expandable apart from the test for the optional argument)
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
deffib{@ifnextchar[fib@i{fib@i[relax]}}
deffib@i[#1]#2{%
ifxrelax#1%
fib@ii{#2}{#2}101%
else
fib@ii{#1}{#2}101%
fi
}
% #1 hide if less than
% #2 target index
% #3 current index
% #4 #5 last two numbers
deffib@ii#1#2#3#4#5{%
ifnum#1<numexpr#3+1relax
thenumexpr#5relax
fi
ifnum#3<#2relax
ifnum#1<numexpr#3+1relax, fi
fib@ii{#1}{#2}{numexpr#3+1relax}{#5}{numexpr#4+#5relax}%
fi}
makeatother
begin{document}
%xtracingall
fib{20}
fib[1]{10}
end{document}
Correct answer by David Carlisle on April 21, 2021
Since you're learning, I'll present a different (fully expandable) solution with expl3
:
documentclass{article}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewExpandableDocumentCommand{fib}{O{#2}m}
{
needle_fib:nn { #1 } { #2 }
}
cs_new:Nn needle_fib:nn
{% start the recursion from fib(1)=1, fib(2)=1
% #1 = current step in the recursion
% #2 = starting point
% #3 = end point
% #4 = fib(#1-2)
% #5 = fib(#1-1)
needle_fib_print:nnnnn { 1 } { #1 } { #2 } { 1 } { 0 }
}
cs_new:Nn needle_fib_print:nnnnn
{
int_compare:nT { #1 >= #2 }
{% the current step is at least the starting point, print the number
int_eval:n { #4 + #5 }
% a comma-space if not at the last but one
int_compare:nTF { #3 - #1 = 1 }
{% the first comparison is for the Oxford comma
int_compare:nF { #3 - #2 = 1 } { , } ~and~ % before the last
}
{ int_compare:nF { #3 = #1 } { ,~ } } % otherwise a comma-space
}
% recursion
int_compare:nT { #1 < #3 }
{
needle_fib_print:ennne
{ int_eval:n { #1 + 1 } } % increase the step
{ #2 } % starting point
{ #3 } % end point
{ #5 } % previous fibonacci number
{ int_eval:n { #4 + #5 } }
}
}
cs_generate_variant:Nn needle_fib_print:nnnnn { ennne }
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
fib{30}
fib[19]{20}
fib[1]{30}
edeftest{fib[1]{5}}
texttt{meaningtest}
fib[1]{46}
end{document}
The 47th Fibonacci number is beyond the arithmetic capabilities of TeX, unless you use bigintcalc
as shown in another answer of mine (which is a variant of this one).
documentclass{article}
usepackage[margin=1cm,a4paper]{geometry}
usepackage{bigintcalc,siunitx}
ExplSyntaxOn
cs_set_eq:NN needle_bigint_add:nn bigintcalcAdd
NewExpandableDocumentCommand{fib}{O{#2}m}
{
needle_fib:nn { #1 } { #2 }
}
cs_new:Nn needle_fib:nn
{% start the recursion from fib(1)=1, fib(2)=1
% #1 = current step in the recursion
% #2 = starting point
% #3 = end point
% #4 = fib(#1-2)
% #5 = fib(#1-1)
needle_fib_print:nnnnn { 1 } { #1 } { #2 } { 1 } { 0 }
}
cs_new:Nn needle_fib_print:nnnnn
{
int_compare:nT { #1 >= #2 }
{% the current step is at least the starting point, print the number
needle_bigint_add:nn { #4} { #5 }
% a comma-space if not at the last but one
int_compare:nTF { #3 - #1 = 1 }
{% the first comparison is for the Oxford comma
int_compare:nF { #3 - #2 = 1 } { , } ~and~ % before the last
}
{ int_compare:nF { #3 = #1 } { ,~ } } % otherwise a comma-space
}
% recursion
int_compare:nT { #1 < #3 }
{
needle_fib_print:ennne
{ int_eval:n { #1 + 1 } } % increase the step
{ #2 } % starting point
{ #3 } % end point
{ #5 } % previous fibonacci number
{ needle_bigint_add:nn { #4 } { #5 } }
}
}
cs_generate_variant:Nn needle_fib_print:nnnnn { ennne }
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
The 200th Fibonacci number is num{fib{200}}
fib{30}
fib[19]{20}
fib[1]{30}
edeftest{fib[1]{5}}
texttt{meaningtest}
begin{flushleft}
fib[1]{200}
end{flushleft}
end{document}
In the picture I only show the first part, the rest is the same as in the other picture. Using num
shows by itself that the macro is fully expandable.
Answered by egreg on April 21, 2021
-My question is how to use
def
and get an optional argument?
You can implement a loop based on futurelet
for removing space tokens and looking at the next non-space-token for finding out if [
denoting an optional argument is present. This is what @ifnextchar
of the LaTeX 2ε-kernel does.
catcode`@=11
longdef@firstofone#1{#1}%
longdef@ifnextchar#1#2#3{%
letreserved@d=#1%
defreserved@a{#2}%
defreserved@b{#3}%
futurelet@let@token@ifnch
}%
def@ifnch{%
ifx@let@token@sptoken
letreserved@c@xifnch
else
ifx@let@tokenreserved@d
letreserved@creserved@a
else
letreserved@creserved@b
fi
fi
reserved@c
}%
@firstofone{def@xifnch} {futurelet@let@token@ifnch}%
defMacroWithOptArg{%
@ifnextchar[{InternalMacroWithOptArg}{InternalMacroWithNoOptArg}%
}%
longdefInternalMacroWithNoOptArg#1{InternalMacroWithOptArg[{#1}]{#1}}
longdefInternalMacroWithOptArg[#1]#2{%
This is the optional argument: #1.
This is the mandatory argument: #2.
}%
MacroWithOptArg[A]{B}
MacroWithOptArg{B}
bye
MacroWithOptArg
at some stage of expansion yields @ifnextchar
which in turn yields a bunch of def
- and futurelet
- and let
-assignments and therefore is not expandable. Therefore, like @ifnextchar
, MacroWithOptArg
is not expandable, too.
(A macro being "expandable" means that all processing triggered by this macro is based on expansion only. In Knuth's analogy where TeX is an organism with eyes and a digestion-tract, all processing triggered by an expandable macro is done in the gullet, where expansion takes place. A macro being "not expandable" means that not just the gullet but also the stomach is involved in the processing. The stomach is the place where assignments are carried out etc.)
Unlike this example, the newcommand
-macro of the LaTeX 2ε-kernel makes macros with optional arguments robust so that in so called "pure expansion contexts" they are not carried out as carrying them out in pure expansion contexts fails.
-Also, i was wondering if there was a better way that to check after each print
ifnum>3
,ifnum=3
and, so that i get the correct display (i.e. commas except for the last number 'and').
Off the cuff I don't see a better way with your code. But fib@i
recursively calls itself, nested between ifnum..fi
. With each iteration another fi
will be accumulated in the input-stack. If you do expandafterfib@ifi
, the fi
won't be accumulated as they get expanded (and hereby removed) before the next instance of fib@i
is carried out. Besides this I modified your emptiness-test so that expandafter
is not needed and it is not relied on relax
not being redefined in terms of outer
—which would be a very weird thing to do, but who knows...
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
newcountprint@limit newcount@limit
newcommandfib[2][]{%
ifcat$detokenize{#1}$%no input#1
print@limit=#2%
else
print@limit=#1%
fi
@tempcnta@ne @tempcntb@ne count@#2 @limittw@
ifnumprint@limit<tw@ number@tempcntb, fi
fib@i}
deffib@i{%
ifnumcount@>@ne
print@fib
@curtab=numexpr@tempcnta+@tempcntbrelax
@tempcnta@tempcntb @tempcntb@curtab
advancecount@-@ne advance@limit@ne
expandafter % <- !!!!!!!!!!
fib@i
fi}
defprint@fib{%
unlessifnum@limit<print@limit%
number@tempcntb%
ifnumcount@>thr@@ , %
elseifnumcount@=thr@@ ~and %
fififi}
makeatother
begin{document}
fib{20}
fib[1]{10}
end{document}
However, i was wondering if it is better to use recursion or loop in this case?
loop
is a recursive macro. ;-)
But it has some shortcomings:
repeat
, goes into a temporary macro. Therefore if loop
is used to define macros that process arguments, hash-doubling is needed with these arguments.loop..repeat
-constructs unless you know exactly what you do. The likelihood is high that the delimiter-matching with the argument-delimiter repeat
won't work in the way expected by you. ;-)As egreg proposed a full-expandable solution with expl3, I see the need of exhibiting shortcomings of expandable checking for the presence of optional arguments:
documentclass{article}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewExpandableDocumentCommand{macro}{O{#2}m}{
message{^^J
This~is~the~optional~argument:~[#1]^^J
This~is~the~non~optional~argument:~{#2}^^J^^J
}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
macro[optional]{non-optional}
macro{[}{optional}]{non-optional}
% The resulting messages should differ but don't.
end{document}
I get the message
This is the optional argument: [optional]
This is the non optional argument: {non-optional}
twice.
I expected the second message to be
This is the optional argument: [[]
This is the non optional argument: {[}
and the sequence {optional}]{non-optional}
to yield the phrase optional]non-optional
within the resulting .pdf-file.
For the sake of having fun I implemented a variant where fib
can also handle negative numbers and where internally an expandable tail-recursive macro fibloop
is called.
ε-TeX's numexpr
is used for doing the arithmetic and ε-TeX's detokenize
is used for checking emptiness of an argument.
In case the upper bound is smaller than the lower bound, no numbers will be printed at all.
documentclass{article}
makeatletter
newcommandUD@firstoftwo[2]{#1}%
newcommandUD@secondoftwo[2]{#2}%
newcommandUD@Exchange[2]{#2#1}%
newcommandfib[2][]{%
expandafterUD@Exchangeexpandafter{expandafter{expandafter>number#2}}{%
expandafterUD@Exchangeexpandafter{expandafter{%
expandafter<numberifcat$detokenize{#1}$%
expandafterUD@firstoftwoelseexpandafterUD@secondoftwofi{#2}{#1}%
}}{fibloop{0}{0}{1}{}{}}%
}{+}%
}%
newcommandfibloop[8]{%
% #1 = n
% #2 = n-th Fibonacci-number
% #3 = (n+1)-th/(n-1)-th fibonacci number
% #4 = comma-space-separated list of Fibonacci-numbers found so far
% #5 = separator to prepend / append
% #6 = < lower bound of range / > upper bound of range = condition for appending Fibonacci-number to list of fibonacci-numbers found so far
% #7 = > upper bound of range / < lower bound of range = condition for ending the loop
% #8 = + / - = operator of arithmetic operations
ifnum#1#7 expandafterUD@firstoftwoelseexpandafterUD@secondoftwofi{%
ifx#8+expandafterUD@firstoftwoelseexpandafterUD@secondoftwofi
{fibloop{-1}{1}{-1}{#4}{#5}{#7}{#6}{-}}{#4}%
}{%
ifnum#1#6 expandafterUD@firstoftwoelseexpandafterUD@secondoftwofi
{UD@Exchange{{}{}}}{%
ifx#8+expandafterUD@firstoftwoelseexpandafterUD@secondoftwofi
{UD@Exchange{{#4#5#2}{, }}}{UD@Exchange{{#2#5#4}{, }}}%
}{%
expandafterUD@Exchangeexpandafter{expandafter{numbernumexpr#2#8#3relax}}{%
expandafterfibloopexpandafter{numbernumexpr#1#81relax}{#3}%
}%
}{#6}{#7}{#8}%
}%
}%
makeatother
parindent=-1.5cm
begin{document}
begin{tabular}{ll}
verb|fib{20}|:&fib{20}
verb|fib[]{20}|:&fib[]{20}
verb|fib[20]{20}|:&fib[20]{20}
verb|fib[1]{10}|:&fib[1]{10}
verb|fib[-10]{10}|:&fib[-10]{10}
verb|fib[0]{10}|:&fib[0]{10}
verb|fib[10]{20}|:&fib[10]{20}
verb|fib[5]{10}|:&fib[5]{10}
verb|fib[-8]{-8}|:&fib[-8]{-8}
verb|fib[-8]{-4}|:&fib[-8]{-4}
verb|fib[-1]{0}|:&fib[-1]{0}
verb|fib{-1}|:&fib{-1}
verb|fib[-1]{-1}|:&fib[-1]{-1}
verb|fib[]{-4}|:&fib[]{-4}
verb|fib[0]{0}|:&fib[0]{0}
verb|fib{0}|:&fib{0}
verb|fib{1}|:&fib{1}
verb|fib[0]{1}|:&fib[0]{1}
verb|fib[1]{1}|:&fib[1]{1}
verb|fib[-4]{-8}|:&fib[-4]{-8}
verb|fib[3]{0}|:&fib[3]{0}
verb|fib[8]{3}|:&fib[8]{3}
verb|fib[3]{-8}|:&fib[3]{-8}
end{tabular}
end{document}
Answered by Ulrich Diez on April 21, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP