Sustainable Living Asked on October 1, 2021
A few brands of chocolate milk mix come in re-sealable tins like this:
It is also possible (and slightly cheaper) to buy ‘refill packs’, in order to reuse the tin. However, these refill packs are made of a soft plastic packaging:
I have read that it is easier/more efficient to recycle tins vs soft plastics, and that the recycling rates are also higher for the former. Does this mean – purely from a sustainability standpoint – I should buy new tins over refill packs?
How do the lifecycles of both tins and refill packs compare?
It matters little, While it takes more energy to make a tin than a bag, HOW much cocoa mix are you buying to justify. It takes 6 megajoules to make an aluminum can, Tin with a lower melting point, slightly less. It takes less than half a megajoule of energy to make a plastic bag.
On the other hand, buy cocoa powder in reusable container that sells it by weight?
Answered by LazyReader on October 1, 2021
Tins ultimately are more sustainable than any soft plastic packaging not only from a recycling point of view but even otherwise. They can be reused safely and for longer periods of time. In fact the only time you will need to throw away a tin is when it is accidentally crushed beyond a certain point where it cannot be restored to the previous shape and that too is just a point of aesthetics unless of course there are holes in your tin which is the only case which can be justified as a practical reason to throw them away and if you will, that too can be solved by applying a small amount of tin metal on the hole to cover it up.
Answered by Nagara Vaelaan on October 1, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP