Physics Asked by 13509 on January 29, 2021
In Finn’s Thermal Physics (equation 2.4), the Young modulus $Y$ of a stretched wire with tension $F$ is given to be
$$Y = frac{L}{A} left( frac{partial F}{partial L}right)_T$$
However, usually the Young modulus is defined to be the ratio of stress and strain, specifically
$$Y = frac{sigma}{varepsilon} = frac{F L_0}{A Delta L} = frac{FL_0}{A(L-L_0)}implies dF = frac{AY}{L_0} dL$$
this would suggest that the relationship given in Finn’s textbook should actually be
$$Y = frac{L_0}{A} left( frac{partial F}{partial L}right)_T$$So I wondered why they have used $L$ instead of $L_0$ in the definition. Is it a mistake? Thanks!
When assuming infinitesimal strains, one can use either $Y=frac{L}{A}left(frac{partial F}{partial L}right)_T$ or $Y=frac{L_0}{A}left(frac{partial F}{partial L}right)_T$, depending on what's convenient; the difference is negligible. The former is related to the definition of the true strain $e$ from $de=dL/L$ (so that $e=ln(1+Delta L/L)$) and the latter to the definition of the engineering strain $varepsilon=Delta L/L$. The difference between the true strain and engineering strain is, of course, also negligible in this context.
Answered by Chemomechanics on January 29, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP