Physics Asked on January 5, 2021
In the Preskill’s notes, QFT 1 page 70, he said:
Unlike charge conjugation $U_C$ and parity $U_P$, $U_{PT}$ is not an observable. For example
begin{align}
U_{PT},e^{itheta} psi=e^{-itheta},U_{PT}psi(x)
end{align}
so eigenvalues of $U_{PT}$ are not characteristic of (a well-defined property of) rays in Hilbert space.
——————————————————————————————————————————
I don’t quit understand the statement.
(1) Did he mean $U_C$ and $U_P$ are observables? but these two are unitary operators rather than Hermitian.
(2) He said $U_{PT}$ are not characteristic of rays in Hilbert space. If he use the example of wave function,
$$U_{PT}psi(x)=psi^*(-x)$$
I would agree. But he used a phase factor which is changed under $U_{PT}$, I don’t understand since the phase factor is not a characteristic of rays in Hilbert space.
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP