Physics Asked by Boreanaz on July 14, 2021
I’m given the following Lagrangian :
$$ L = L_{f1 }(psi_1, barpsi_1) + L_{f2}(psi_2, barpsi_2) + lambda (barpsi_1 gamma^{mu} psi_2) (barpsi_2 gamma_{mu} psi_1) $$
where $L_{fi}$ are two different free fermionic Lagrangian.
What I understand, just by looking at the form of the interaction term, is that we have just one type of vertex, that involves 4 different fields: $psi_1, psi_2, barpsi_1, barpsi_2$. Limiting our discussion to $2 to 2$ processes, my guess is that the only interactions, with a non null first order contribution, would have the form $ (psi_1 psi_2 to barpsi_1 barpsi_2)$, $(barpsi_1 barpsi_2 to psi_1 psi_2)$ or $ (psi_i barpsi_j to psi_j barpsi_i)$; in other terms I’m considering all the possible permutations of the 4 listed fields.
But then, looking at my professor’s notes, he computes the total amplitude of scattering processes — like $(psi_1 psi_2 to psi_1 psi_2)$ or $(barpsi_i psi_j to barpsi_i psi_j)$ — simply using the single vertex rule (i.e. like a first order process). Why is so? Is that just a coincidence (maybe an error) or a consequence of the simmetry of the given Lagrangian? In the case he meant to consider a first order computation, why can we use the same vertex rule, arbitrarily replacing the fields with their complex/dagged/barred version?
I have an extra question: if I’m considering a $3 to 1$ (or, equivalently a $1 to 3$) process, can I just use the same vertex rule? I’m propending to an affermative answer, since the vertex doesn’t distinguish (in this case) between incoming and outgoing particles.
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP