Physics Asked on December 10, 2020
It is possible to get the Schwartzschild metric assuming spherical symmetry, vacuum solution and Minkowski spacetime when $r to infty$.
Is it possible an analytic solution for a geocentric system? I mean, taking the apparent daily movement of the celestial bodies as real. So, the (apparent) trajectories of moon, sun and planets should be geodesics according to the metric.
I suppose it is necessary to assume that when $r to infty$ geodesics are circles, as the fixed stars does every night from an observer on earth. So it is not a Minkowski metric at infinity.
I don’t know if the Godel solution is something like that.
There isn’t even an exact solution for the two-body problem in General Relativity, much less for the $n$-body problem, even if you take the center of mass as the origin. The $n$-body problem doesn’t have an exact solution in Newtonian gravity.
Answered by G. Smith on December 10, 2020
As G. Smith said, there are no exact solutions to GR describing orbiting bodies.
That aside, the center of the orbit is absolute in general relativity in the sense that, for instance, the Doppler shift and aberration of distant objects shows a yearly variation consistent with circular/elliptical motion. Of course, you can always pick a coordinate system that puts you at the center of the universe, but coordinates have no physical significance. In terms of actually measurable quantities like Doppler shift, the heliocentric (or rather center-of-mass-centric) picture is clearly more sensible than the geocentric picture.
Answered by benrg on December 10, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP