Physics Asked on May 20, 2021
Is the representation of dimension 2 of $SU(2)$ also a representation of dimension 2 of the part connected to the identity of the group $SO(3,1)$?
To better explain my question:
The representation of dimension 2 of $SU(2)$ is given by exponentiation of the Pauli matrices:
$ U( pmb{epsilon}) = exp (i pmb{epsilon} cdot pmb{sigma} ) $.
At the same time the Lorentz algebra has generators $J^{pm, i}$ with $i=1, 2, 3$. The commutation relations are:
$[J^{+, i}, J^{+, j} ] = i epsilon^{ijk} J^{+, k}$
$[J^{-, i}, J^{-, j} ] = i epsilon^{ijk} J^{-, k}$
$[J^{+, i}, J^{-, j} ] = 0$.
This means that the algebra $so(3, 1)$ is just the algebra $su(2)$ "twice". Or in symbols: $so(3,1)=su(2) + su(2)$. When building the representation $(frac{1}{2}, 0 )$ one maps $ J^{+, i} $ to the Pauli matrices and the $ J^{-, i} $ to the null matrix, so they contribute nothing to exponential. This way one builds a representation of the part connected to the identity of the Lorentz group by exponentiation:
$Lambda = exp (i pmb{epsilon} cdot pmb{sigma}) $.
This is exactly the fundamental representation of $SU(2)$.
Is my reasoning correct? If not, what did I miss?
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP