Physics Asked by Alberto Gomez Saiz on May 4, 2021
From the book Quantum Mechanics by Cohen-Tannoudji it seems that the only requirement for an Operator to be an Observable is to form an orthonormal basis in the state space (finite or infinite dimensional)
"By definition, the Hermitian operator $A$ is an observable if this orthonormal system of vectors forms a basis in the state space."
In the rest of the book, the Hamiltonian $H$ is always referred to as an Operator (e.g. when talking about the Schrödinger picture). However I fail to see why in some cases the Hamiltonian cannot fulfil the definition of Observable.
Eigenvalues of $H$ are the energy states of the system, so in order to have a real value for the energy $H$ has to be hermitian and so an observable. Also the hamiltonian operator is based on the momentum operator that is hermitian too. You can try to write the integral form of $langle psi|H|psirangle $ and $langle psi|H^dagger|psirangle $ for a generic $H$ and you would get the same result.
Answered by Edo98 on May 4, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP