Physics Asked on January 4, 2021
In this paper1 the following bandstructure of Bi$_2$Se$_3$ is shown:
In "a" they show the bands without Spin orbit coupling (SOC) and in "b" they include SOC.
It is said that:
"Figure 2a and b show the band structure of Bi$_2$Se$_3$
without and with SOC, respectively. By comparing the two figure
parts, one can see clearly that the only qualitative change induced
by turning on SOC is an anti-crossing feature around the $Gamma$ point,
which thus indicates an inversion between the conduction band
and valence band due to SOC effects, suggesting that Bi$_2$Se$_3$ is a
topological insulator"
What is meant by the "anti crossing around the $Gamma$ point after SOC is turned on?" Also before SOC is turned on there is no crossing between valence band and conduction band!?
And what is meant by the "inversion between conduction and valence band"? Am I supposed to see that conduction and valence bands are mirrored at the Fermi level (dashed line) when going from the left figure to the right? And why does this indicate that we have a topological insulator?
1 H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang & S.-C. Zhang, "Topological insulators in $require{mhchem}ce{Bi2Se3}$, $ce{Bi2Te3}$ and $ce{Sb2Te3}$ with a single Dirac cone on the surface", Nat. Phys. 5, 438–442 (2009).
Correct answer by Milarepa on January 4, 2021
For systems being not only time-reversal symmetric but also inversion symmetric, a $mathbb{Z}_{2}$-topological invariant distinguishing a trivial insulator from a topological insulator can be defined as a product over the parity eigenvalues of all occupied band eigenstates evaluated at all time-reversal invariant momenta. Therefore, a band inversion occurring only at $Gamma$ , which is driven by SOC, results in turning the symmetry of the last occupied band eigenstate at this momentum from antisymmetric to symmetric, indeed changing your topological invariant. Basically, including SOC affects the band structure by lowering the energy of the first unoccupied band and raising the energy of the first occupied band at $Gamma$ enough to exchange them, making for an inverted band structure. In principle, I think you are not supposed to recognize how the conduction and valence band are “mirrored” (as you wrote, they are rather exchanged) comparing the two figures, since including SOC qualitatively affects the shape of your bands.
Details regarding the mathematical formulation of the topological invariant depending on the parity of the band eigenstates can be found here: https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0611341
The specific example of $text{Bi}_{2}text{Se}_{3}$ and the mechanism for which SOC drives the band inversion are discussed herein: https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys1270
Answered by Milarepa on January 4, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP