Physics Asked on December 4, 2021
In Griffith’s introduction to electromagnetism on page 479, there is this following equation:
begin{align*}
nabla V &cong nabla left[frac{1}{4pi epsilon_0} frac{boldsymbol{hat r} cdot dot{mathbf{p}}(t_0)}{rc} right] \
&cong left[frac{1}{4pi epsilon_0} frac{boldsymbol{hat r} cdot ddot{mathbf{p}}(t_0)}{rc} right] nabla t_0 \
&= -frac{1}{4pi epsilon_0 c^2} frac{[boldsymbol{hat r} cdot ddot{mathbf{p}}(t_0)]}{r} boldsymbol{hat{r}}
end{align*}
given that $t_0equiv t – dfrac{r}{c}$. Why is it that one the second line the dipole moment — the $p$ function — gains an extra time derivative if the gradient is in terms of partial spatial derivatives?
$t_0=t-r/c$ is a function of $r$, so the $nabla$ acting on it is the same as $partial_t$ (complicated a bit by signs and $c$). It would be easier to see if he didn't use $t_0$, and put it all in terms of $(t-r/c)$ explicitly.
Answered by Jerrold Franklin on December 4, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP