Physics Asked by yasalami on December 8, 2020
Let us suppose we have the operators $a(omega)$ and $a^dagger(omega)$ with $[a(omega),a^dagger (omega’)] = delta(omega-omega’)$. Does a derivative of the Fock state $a^dagger(omega) |0rangle$ with respect to $omega$ exist, that is $partial_{omega} a^dagger(omega) |0rangle $. Or more generally, do these expressions make senes
begin{equation}
partial_{omega} a^dagger(omega)
partial_{omega} a(omega)
end{equation}
Intuitively, I would guess that the derivative does not exist because of the orthogonality of Fock states for different $omega$. But maybe the derivative can be expressed in terms of a delta function.
My idea to find an expression for the derivative is the following. First let us rewrite the annihilation operator as
begin{equation}
a(omega) = int domega’ delta (omega’ – omega) a(omega’).
end{equation}
Differentiation of the above expression with $partial_{omega}delta (omega’ – omega) = -delta’ (omega’-omega) = frac{1}{omega’-omega} delta (omega’ – omega)$ yields
begin{equation}
partial_{omega}a(omega) = int domega’ partial_{omega}delta (omega’ – omega) a(omega’) = frac{1}{omega-omega} a(omega) .
end{equation}
So one could argue that the derivative does not exist or that is equals $infty$, is that correct?
In quantum field theory deriving operators with respect to parameters is routine. (Recall how the canonical momentum field is produced.)
So, if you are careful, of course you may define such objects. For instance, $[a(omega),a^dagger (omega')] = delta(omega-omega')$ can yield $$[partial_{omega} a(omega),a^dagger (omega')] = partial_{omega} delta(omega-omega').$$
Given the identity $$ (partial_{omega} + partial_{omega’})delta(omega-omega')=0, $$ you then see that. e.g., $$ [partial_{omega} a(omega),int!! domega'~ f(omega')~a^dagger (omega')] = int!! domega'~ f(omega')~ partial_{omega} delta(omega-omega') = -int!! domega'~ f(omega')~ partial_{omega'} delta(omega-omega') = int!! domega'~partial_{omega'} f(omega')~ delta(omega-omega') = f'(omega).$$
NB Response to comment ancillary question Yes, of course. Since $$partial_x a(omega/x)= -{omega over x} partial_omega a(omega/x),$$ and analogously for $a^dagger (omega'/x)$, you indeed have, obviously, $$ [partial_x a(omega/x) , partial_x a^dagger (omega'/x)]={omega omega' over x^2}partial_omega partial_{omega '} [ a(omega/x) , a^dagger (omega'/x)]= -{omega omega ' over x}partial^2_omega delta (omega-omega'). $$
Correct answer by Cosmas Zachos on December 8, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP