Mathematics Asked by Code mx on December 6, 2021
The paper "The Distribution of the Maxima of a Random Curve" derives a certain probability as the following integral (p. 413):
$$int_{y_0}^{y_0+Delta y}dxiint_{0}^{M_2Delta x}detaint_{-M_2}^{eta/Delta x}dzeta P(xi,eta,zeta)tag{a}
$$
and says …
Therefore this integral cannot differ from $q(Delta x, Delta y)$ by more than terms of order $Delta y(Delta x)^2.$ By changing the order of integration, using the mean value theorem for integrals and the fact that $P(xi,eta,zeta)$ is a continuous function of all its variables, it may be shown that $$lim_{Delta x, Delta yto 0} {q(Delta x, Delta y)over Delta xDelta y}=-int_{-M_2}^0 P(y_0,0,zeta),zeta,dzetatag{b}$$
Obtaining the RHS of (b) from (a) is apparently supposed to be straightforward, but would someone kindly explain this in more detail?
Because no one else has replied, I'll post an answer (although it's been many years since I've dealt with limits of multiple integrals) ...
For convenience, I'm going to write $u,v,w$ in place of $xi,eta,zeta,$ so the quantity of interest is $$begin{align}&lim_{Delta x, Delta yto 0} {q(Delta x, Delta y)over Delta xDelta y}\ &= lim_{Delta x, Delta yto 0} {1over Delta xDelta y}int_{y_0}^{y_0+Delta y}duint_{0}^{M_2Delta x}dvint_{-M_2}^{v/Delta x}dw P(u,v,w)tag{1}\[2ex] &=lim_{Delta x, Delta yto 0} {1over Delta xDelta y}int_{y_0}^{y_0+Delta y}duint_{-M_2}^{0}dwint_{0}^{-w,Delta x}dv P(u,v,w)tag{2}\[2ex] &=lim_{Delta x, Delta yto 0} {1over Delta xDelta y}int_{y_0}^{y_0+Delta y}duint_{-M_2}^{0}dw P(u,c_{Delta x},w),(-wDelta x)tag{3}\[2ex] &=lim_{Delta x, Delta yto 0} {1over Delta xDelta y}int_{-M_2}^{0}dw P(c_{Delta y},c_{Delta x},w),(Delta y),(-wDelta x)tag{4}\[2ex] &=lim_{Delta x, Delta yto 0} int_{-M_2}^{0}dw P(c_{Delta y},c_{Delta x},w),(-w)tag{5}\[2ex] &=-int_{-M_2}^{0}dw P(y_0,0,w),wtag{6}\[2ex] end{align}$$
where
$(1)implies(2)$ by changing the order of integration on $(v,w)$, noting that the region of integration in the $(v,w)$-plane is a triangle bounded by $0<v<M_2Delta x$ on the $v$-axis,$-M_2<w<0$ on the $w$-axis, and the line $w=-v/Delta x,$ i.e., the line $v=-wDelta x$.
$(2)implies(3)$ by the mean value theorem for integrals, $(-wDelta x)$ being the width of the interval of integration on $v$, i.e. $[0,-wDelta x]$, and $c_{Delta x}$ being some value in that interval.
$(3)implies(4)$, again by the mean value theorem, where $c_{Delta y}in[y_0,y_0+Delta y].$
$(4)implies(5)$, dividing through by $Delta x,Delta y$.
$(5)implies(6)$, because $c_{Delta y}$ and $c_{Delta x}$ are confined to intervals that converge to the points ${y_0}$ and ${0}$, respectively.
NB: This result is not obtained by considering it to be some sort of expectation value, even though the integrand is a product of $w$ and the joint probability density function evaluated at $(u,v)=(y_0,0).$ (An expectation requires the product to be $w$ and the marginal probability density for $w$, which is not obtained from the joint density by simply plugging in constants for $(u,v)$. Maybe it can be seen as the limit of some such?)
Answered by r.e.s. on December 6, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP