Mathematica Asked on March 24, 2021
I am trying to write a function that returns a list of pure functions. The last step in the function, is to multiply the list of pure functions by a list of scalars (i.e. matrix multiplication). When I try to evaluate the resulting functions, it does not work.
Code
calcShapeFunctions[nnpe_] := Module[
{m, xiCoord, etaCoord, p, c},
m = Array[
Function[{xi,
eta}, {1, xi, eta, xi*eta, xi^2, eta^2, xi^2*eta, xi*eta^2,
xi^2*eta^2}[[#]]] &, nnpe];
xiCoord = {-1, 1, 1, -1, 0, 1, 0, -1, 0};
etaCoord = {-1, -1, 1, 1, -1, 0, 1, 0, 0};
p = m[[1 ;; nnpe]];
c = Array[Through[p[xiCoord[[#]], etaCoord[[#]]]] &, nnpe];
Return[p.Inverse[c]];
];
Incorrect Output
Through[calcShapeFunctions[3][x, y]]
returns:
{(1/2 Function[{xi,
eta}, {1, xi, eta, xi eta, xi^2, eta^2, xi^2 eta, xi eta^2,
xi^2 eta^2}[[1]]] –
1/2 Function[{xi,
eta}, {1, xi, eta, xi eta, xi^2, eta^2, xi^2 eta, xi eta^2,
xi^2 eta^2}[[2]]])[x,
y], (1/2 Function[{xi,
eta}, {1, xi, eta, xi eta, xi^2, eta^2, xi^2 eta, xi eta^2,
xi^2 eta^2}[[2]]] –
1/2 Function[{xi,
eta}, {1, xi, eta, xi eta, xi^2, eta^2, xi^2 eta, xi eta^2,
xi^2 eta^2}[[3]]])[x,
y], (1/2 Function[{xi,
eta}, {1, xi, eta, xi eta, xi^2, eta^2, xi^2 eta, xi eta^2,
xi^2 eta^2}[[1]]] +
1/2 Function[{xi,
eta}, {1, xi, eta, xi eta, xi^2, eta^2, xi^2 eta, xi eta^2,
xi^2 eta^2}[[3]]])[x, y]}
Desired Output
Through[calcShapeFunctions[3][x, y]]
should return:
{1/2 – x/2, x/2 – y/2, 1/2 + y/2}
Further Thoughts
Assuming we can get this to work, how would I go about obtaining the derivatives of the pure function with respect to one of its independent variables (xi and eta)?
As with the last question on which I believe this one is based, it may be simpler to use a single function rather than a list of functions.
To understand my code you will need to know that:
Function
with Part
just as you would any other expressionPart
always wraps element sequences with the original head of the expressionI chose to use Slot
(#
and #2
) because it makes this manipulation much simpler, though it would be possible with named parameters with more work.
Other notes:
calc
function to be a single function as well, simplifying both the code and the application of itp
as it appeared to be a copy of m
With
is use to evaluate certain parts of the output Function
The code:
calcFn2[nnpe_] :=
Module[{m, xiCoord, etaCoord, p, c, xi, eta},
m = {1, #, #2, # #2, #^2, #2^2, #^2 #2, # #2^2, #^2 #2^2} &;
m = m[[{1}, ;; nnpe]];
xiCoord = {-1, 1, 1, -1, 0, 1, 0, -1, 0};
etaCoord = {-1, -1, 1, 1, -1, 0, 1, 0, 0};
c = Array[m[xiCoord[[#]], etaCoord[[#]]] &, nnpe];
With[{ic = Inverse[c], mev = m}, mev[##].ic &]
]
calcFn2[3][x, y]
{1/2 - x/2, x/2 - y/2, 1/2 + y/2}
Correct answer by Mr.Wizard on March 24, 2021
You could define your own operator that maps a scalar and a function to a function i.e. $otimes: mathbb{R}timesfrak{F} to frak{F} $
CircleTimes[c_, f_] := (c f[##] &)
and use it like c Escc*Esc f to get:
f[x_]:=x
10 ⊗ f
(* 10 f[##] & *)
And you can Thread over lists:
constants = RandomReal[1, 3];
functions = {Sin[#1]Cos[#2]&, Cos, Exp};
result = Thread[CircleTimes[constants, functions]]
(* {0.845413 (Sin[#1] Cos[#2] &)[##1] &, 0.835235 Cos[##1] &, 0.103793 Exp[##1] &} *)
You can easily get derivatives with D
by naming the arguments:
D[result[[1]][x, y], x]
(* 0.845413 Cos[x] Cos[y] *)
D[result[[2]][x], x]
(* -0.835235 Sin[x] *)
Derivative
is a little more picky, it doesn't handle ## (SlotSequence
) like one would expect:
Derivative[1, 0][(Sin[#1] Cos[#2] &)[##1] &][x, y]
(* 0 *)
Derivative[1, 0][(Sin[#1] Cos[#2] &)[#1, #2] &][x, y]
(* Cos[x] Cos[y] *)
I'd go with D
that symbolically evaluates the nested functions to avoid further surprises.
Answered by ssch on March 24, 2021
First, to evaluate the functions embedded in calcShapeFunctions[3]
, you could do the following:
calcShapeFunctions[3] /. f_Function :> f[x, y]
{1/2 - x/2, x/2 - y/2, 1/2 + y/2}
But to find the derivatives, you need to alter how calcShapeFunctions
function is defined so that the bodies of your Function
s are evaluated and the part of the list of formulas is extracted (line 4):
calcShapeFunctions[nnpe_] :=
Module[{m, xiCoord, etaCoord, (*p,*) c},
m = Array[Function[{xi, eta},
Evaluate@{1, xi, eta, xi*eta, xi^2, eta^2, xi^2*eta, xi*eta^2, xi^2*eta^2}[[#]]] &,
nnpe];
xiCoord = {-1, 1, 1, -1, 0, 1, 0, -1, 0};
etaCoord = {-1, -1, 1, 1, -1, 0, 1, 0, 0};
(*p = m[[1 ;; nnpe]];*) (* same as p = m *)
c = Array[Through[m[xiCoord[[#]], etaCoord[[#]]]] &, nnpe];
Return[m.Inverse[c]];];
Then the derivatives can be done as follows:
calcShapeFunctions[3] /. f_Function :> Derivative[1, 0][f][x, y]
{-(1/2), 1/2, 0}
calcShapeFunctions[3] /. f_Function :> Derivative[0, 1][f][x, y]
{0, -(1/2), 1/2}
(Note: In calcShapeFunctions
, the variable p
was the same as m
, so I replaced it.)
Response to comment
In response to the OP's request as to how I would modify Mr. Wizard's answer, I offer the following. As I suggested in a comment, I would Evaluate
the function body inside With
:
calcFn2[nnpe_] :=
Module[{m, xiCoord, etaCoord, p, c, xi, eta},
m = {1, #, #2, # #2, #^2, #2^2, #^2 #2, # #2^2, #^2 #2^2} &;
m = m[[{1}, ;; nnpe]];
xiCoord = {-1, 1, 1, -1, 0, 1, 0, -1, 0};
etaCoord = {-1, -1, 1, 1, -1, 0, 1, 0, 0};
c = Array[m[xiCoord[[#]], etaCoord[[#]]] &, nnpe];
With[{ic = Inverse[c], mev = m}, Evaluate[mev[#1, #2].ic] &]]
calcFn2[4]
(* {1/4 - #1/4 - #2/4 + (#1 #2)/4, 1/4 + #1/4 - #2/4 - (#1 #2)/4,
1/4 + #1/4 + #2/4 + (#1 #2)/4, 1/4 - #1/4 + #2/4 - (#1 #2)/4} & *)
One can take the Derivative
of the Function
:
Derivative[0, 1][calcFn2[4]]
(* {-(1/4) + #1/4, -(1/4) - #1/4, 1/4 + #1/4, 1/4 - #1/4} & *)
And plug in expressions:
Derivative[0, 1][calcFn2[4]][x, y]
(* {-(1/4) + x/4, -(1/4) - x/4, 1/4 + x/4, 1/4 - x/4} *)
Or one can apply D
to the expression calcFn2[3][x, y]
:
D[calcFn2[4][x, y], y]
(* {-(1/4) + x/4, -(1/4) - x/4, 1/4 + x/4, 1/4 - x/4} *)
Answered by Michael E2 on March 24, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP