Geographic Information Systems Asked on February 20, 2021
I am building a suitability map in which I have different vector layers and raster data, I have converted all my vector layers into raster and I am using these two formulas to normalize the distribution and then standardize into a common scale from 1 to 0.
Theses are the formulas that I am using: Raster calculator in ArcGIS, (x – mean) / stdv –> ( x – min(x) ) / ( max(x) – min(x) )
I just want to check if this is a good approach to standardize my layers? or what is the best approach to normalizing different nature layers to then proceed with weighted overlay analysis?
It is difficult to give a direct answer, it depends on your data, the first thing is to be clear about the basics.
The first thing you should do is an exploratory data analysis (ESDA)
In this case you are assuming that the mean and standard deviation are a good descriptor of the distribution of your data. This is ideal, if your data has a normal distribution. This is true even if your data deviates from the normal distribution, due to the Cheviched theorem and the Central Limit theorem.
This approach tends to fit better with any distribution. The transformed value will represent in units the interquartile range that is so far from the median.
Answered by Luis Perez on February 20, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP