English Language & Usage Asked by Dapeng on December 6, 2020
I wonder whether "lower than is that of" should simply be "lower than that of" in the following sentence.
Lobbying competition reduces the pollution tax if the magnitude of the clean
firm’s marginal change in profit with respect to the pollution tax is lower than is that of the
dirty firm at the equilibrium.
Thank you very much for your kind help!!!
Consider a few possible ways of saying this.
1 ... magnitude of A is lower than B [this would be correct only if B possessed a magnitude in the same way as A does]
2 ... magnitude of A is lower than that of B [correct because "that" refers to the previous mention of magnitude]. This your suggestion and it is correct and concise.
3 ... magnitude of A is lower than the magnitude of B is. [correct but the "is" is not really needed. It adds nothing to 2.]
4 ... magnitude of A is lower than is the magnitude of B. [a more awkward way of saying 3.]
Not only does 4 add nothing to 2 but it may also confuse because it could be taken to say ... magnitude of A is lower than "the magnitude of B is lower". Without anything with which B can be compared, this becomes meaningless.
Answered by Anton on December 6, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP