English Language & Usage Asked by JT2476 on February 16, 2021
In one chapter of the book, Extremely loud and incredibly close (pages 208-216), the author uses commas instead of periods to join several sentences without listing nor using conjunctions between them.
For example:
We were pulled off the truck and placed under it, the planes dove, I lost conciousness again, when I awoke I was in a white hospital bed, doctors operated on me, they gave me injections and bandaged my body, but it was her touch that saved my life.
Versus:
We were pulled off the truck and placed under it. The planes dove. I lost conciousness again. When I awoke I was in a white hospital bed. Doctors operated on me. They gave me injections and bandaged my body, but it was her touch that saved my life.
Which rhetorical device is this? Is there a word for it?
This general stylistic device is called asyndeton:
'A rhetorical figure which omits the conjunction'
Oxford English Dictionay
'omission of the conjunctions that ordinarily join coordinate words or clauses
(as in "I came, I saw, I conquered")'
Merriam-Webster
See e.g. here for more examples. There doesn't seem to be a specific name for the case when what is being joined are main clauses as opposed to subclausal groups of words.
One of the most frequently quoted examples of this literary scheme is Winston Churchill's address 'We shall fight on the beaches':
We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender…
Another famous example, where the entities being joined by the commas aren't main clauses, is this part of Lincoln's Gettysburg address:
…and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth
The grammatical term for all this is asyndetic combination (CGEL, pp. 1276, 1741-1742). In the specific case of your example and Churchill's address, it is asyndetic combination of main clauses.
Correct answer by linguisticturn on February 16, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP