English Language & Usage Asked on September 15, 2020
I re-wrote sentences to start Unclear below. Correct if I move “unclear” to end?
From poverty-stricken to government-funded:
on the the diachrony of English noun-participle compounding.
Martin Hilpert, Université de Neuchâtel
There is some initial evidence to suggest that noun-participle compounding are, in
synchronic usage, independent from the English passive. First, not all passive sentences
have counterparts in idiomatic noun-participle compounds, consider for instance
unattested formations such as ?car-transported (The cargo was transported by car) or ?
guest-preferred (The guided tours were preferred by the guests). Second, forms such as
Atlanta-based or work-related do instantiate noun-participle compounding, but these
formations correspond to predicative constructions (The company is based in Atlanta;
The problem is related to work) similar to the German Zustandspassiv, rather than to
canonical passive sentences.What is[U]nclear is if these more problematic examples
represent a recent development or whether they are in fact central members of the
constructional category.
If these more problematic examples
represent a recent development or whether they are in fact central members of the
constructional category, is unclear.
First Language Phonetic Drift During Second Language Acquisition. Charles Bond Chang – 2010. p. 171.
Thus, just as there seems to be a “sweet spot” of distance from L1
for inducing assimilatory phonetic drift, so too might there be a “sweet spot” of
distance from L1 for inducing dissimilatory phonetic drift: an L2 sound has to be
distant enough from L1 sounds to be considered a “new” sound, yet not so distant
that there is no L1 sound within its vicinity.What remains[U]nclear is if there is
indeed a degree of distance from L1 that qualifies as too far to cause dissimilation.
Moreover, the SLM’s formulation of the basis for cross-language dissimilation in terms
of segmental categories implies that dissimilation can only occur at the segmental
level, but whether this holds true remains to be seen.
If there is
indeed a degree of distance from L1 that qualifies as too far to cause dissimilation, remains unclear.
FIRST PARAGRAPH:
What is unclear is whether these more problematic examples represent a recent development or are in fact central members of the constructional category.
OR
Whether these more problematic examples represent a recent development or are in fact central members of the constructional category is unclear.
OR
It is unclear whether these more problematic examples represent a recent development or are in fact central members of the constructional category.
SECOND PARAGRAPH:
What remains unclear is whether there is indeed a degree of distance from L1 that qualifies as too far to cause dissimilation.
OR
Whether or not there is indeed a degree of distance from L1 that qualifies as too far to cause dissimilation remains unclear.
If you really wanted to start with 'If', you could say:
If there is indeed a degree of distance from L1 that qualifies as too far to cause dissimilation, that fact remains unclear.
But it's not as idiomatic.
We don't use 'Unclear' at the start of a sentence.
Answered by Old Brixtonian on September 15, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP