English Language & Usage Asked by LyLa_Austin on October 15, 2020
Here is the original sentence:
In early 1992, Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants, and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, was (they WERE evaluating?) evaluating two opportunities..
I think this is wrong because there is an “and” after the “along with” prepositional phrase.
So, if we break down the sentence:
In early 1992, {Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO}, {along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants}, {and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning}, was evaluating two opportunities…
The “and” seems to leave us with the noun structure of:
“Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning were evaluating two opportunities…?
Thoughts?
You're looking at that "and" from one perspective, partly because the original sentence was so loosely written.
Rather than interpreting the “and” as separating Wayne and the presidents from Ken, why not just as easily join the presidents with Ken, opposing the combination to Wayne?
Answered by Robbie Goodwin on October 15, 2020
In early 1992 Wayne Calloway, PepsiCo’s chairman and CEO, along with the presidents of each of the company’s restaurants and Ken Stevens, the senior vice president of strategic planning, were evaluating two opportunities.
All that was needed was two drop the first and fourth commas, and use were instead of was (for a compound subject).
Answered by Bread on October 15, 2020
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP