TransWikia.com

Non-trivial steady state

Economics Asked on July 18, 2021

Consider the growth model with inelastic labor supply, full depreciation, log utility and CRS technology with the Bellman equation be defined as follows:
$$V(k)=max(log(k^alpha-k’)+beta V(k’))$$
st $$kgeq0 text{and} theta k^alpha-k’geq0$$

As a guess I have used the usual $V(k)=a+bln(k)$ substituted on the Bellman and have derived $k’=frac{k^alphabeta b}{1+beta b}$. From this I have found the $k_{ss}=(frac{1+beta b}{beta b})^{1/(alpha-1)}$ called the non-trivial SS

This is the first SS while the other is $k_{ss}=0$

My question is how can we use the policy function to show that the system converges to the non-trivial steady steady state given any $k_0 > 0$

One Answer

Let's guess that the value function is of the form $a + b ln(k)$.

Then substituting for $V(k) = a + b ln(k)$ in the Bellman equation gives: $$ a + b ln(k) = max_{k'}left(ln(k^alpha - k') + beta(a + b ln(k')right) $$ The first order condition is given by: $$ begin{align*} &frac{-1}{k^alpha - k'} + beta b frac{1}{k'} = 0, to & k' = beta b (k^alpha - k'), to & k' = frac{beta b}{1+ beta b} k^alpha end{align*} $$ If we plug this into the objective function of the Bellman equation, we obtain the following identity: $$ begin{align*} a + b ln(k) &= lnleft(k^alpha - frac{beta b}{1 + beta b}k^alpharight) + betaleft(a + b lnleft(frac{beta b}{1 + beta b}k^alpharight)right), &= (alpha + beta b alpha) ln(k) + lnleft(1 - frac{beta b}{1 + beta b}right) + beta a + beta b lnleft(frac{beta b}{1 + beta b}right) end{align*} $$ As this holds for all $k (> 0)$ we can equate coefficients on both sides: $$ begin{align*} a &= lnleft(frac{1}{1 + beta b}right) + beta a + beta b lnleft(frac{beta b}{1 + beta b}right), b & = alpha + beta b alpha end{align*} $$ The second one gives a closed form expression for $b$: $$ b = frac{alpha}{1 - beta alpha}. $$ Then substituting this into the first order condition gives: $$ begin{align*} k_{t+1} &= frac{beta frac{alpha}{1 - beta alpha}}{1 + beta frac{alpha}{1 - beta alpha}}k_t^alpha, &= beta alpha k^alpha_t tag{1} end{align*} $$

This shows that: $$ k_{t + 1} > k_t iff beta alpha k_t^alpha > k_t iff k_t < (beta alpha)^{frac{1}{1 - alpha}} $$ So the capital stock will rise as long as $k_t$ is below $(beta alpha)^{frac{1}{1 - alpha}}$ and it will decrease if $k_t$ it is above this threshold.

According to the dynamic equation (1) above, it would appear that $k = 0$ is also a steady state. However, for $k = 0$, the first order conditions are not satisfied and in fact the value function does not exist. Anyway, for $k_t$ very close, it's value will be below $(beta alpha)^{frac{1}{1 - alpha}}$ so the stock of capital should increase to the unique steady state.

Correct answer by tdm on July 18, 2021

Add your own answers!

Ask a Question

Get help from others!

© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP