Cross Validated Asked on December 8, 2021
I have a Poisson distributed glm where I have identified the origin
parameter to be significant through comparison to a nest model dropping that parameter:
mpoi1 = glm(count ~ marker + gene, data = somedata, family = "poisson")
mpoi2 = glm(count ~ origin + marker + gene, data = somedata, family = "poisson")
anova(mpoi1, mpoi2, test = "Chisq")
Analysis of Deviance Table
Model 1: count ~ marker + gene
Model 2: count ~ origin + marker + gene
Resid. Df Resid. Dev Df Deviance Pr(>Chi)
1 459 349.44
2 458 342.11 1 7.328 0.006789 **
The parameter origin
is made up of two subcategories (free and FGT). Is there a way I can identify which of the marker
subcategory (duplication, proximity, phylogeny and known_target) counts are affected the most by the origin
parameter?
I though a Welch Two Sample T-test
might suffice but none of the subcategories returned significant. I did this by running the test on a subset of the dataset to include only one marker
subcategory such as:
t.test(count ~ origin, data = known)
Despite each returning non significant, the mean was consistently higher in the FGT origin
subgroup for every marker subcategory.
Please feel free to ask more questions if I have not explained myself well.
Get help from others!
Recent Answers
Recent Questions
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP