Cross Validated Asked by Unistudent87 on December 8, 2021
The Financial Review wished to estimate the amount of annual government spending using tax revenue and level of nationwide debt. Data from 1958-2008 (inclusive) was used. All variables were measured in billions of dollars. It was found that the mean square error for the regression was 15 and the total sum of squares was 12200. Hence, what percentage of the variation in annual government spending is explained by the regression equation? Give your answer correct to two decimal places.
My Perspective:
Mean square of error (MSE) = 15
Total sum of squares (SST) = 12200
The question is asking for R squared, so
$R^2 = SSR / SST$, but so far we only have $SST$. How do we derive $SSR$ from the $MSE$ in this case?
The question wants to find out R-sq
Rsq = Variance of Variables in the model/Total variance
Variance = MSE/df; hence df is required.
let n be number of years of observation =51. Let k be number of variables (treatments) in the model = 2 (tax revenue, natl debt)
Hence; SSTr = MSTr/treatment df = (12200-15)/(51-2)
And
Rsq = {(12200-15)/(51-2)}/(12200/51-1)
Answered by user292123 on December 8, 2021
Think about how many degrees of freedom there must be (total, residual & regression). Then you can work backwards from the $MSE$ to get the missing $SS$s.
Answered by gung - Reinstate Monica on December 8, 2021
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP