Bioinformatics Asked on February 12, 2021
My understanding from this page https://www.biostars.org/p/272364/ is that it’s related to ‘High Scoring Pairs’, which are in turn related to the way BLAST works. I’m still not sure how to interpret that for my data.
I’ve blasted a set of contigs that contain at least some of my genes of interest (and often nothing but) against a database of my genes of interest in known organisms. Top hits are all E=0, no issue here. Where things get complicated is that I know the top-scoring hit (let’s call it ‘A’) is from a slightly more distantly-related organism. In fact, among the top hits (bit score 988-991), all that distinguishes the ‘correct’* match (let’s call it ‘B’)is the fact that it also has the highest N.
*I call it a ‘correct’ match because there is additional information (phylogenetics of the genes involved, genome-level phylogeny) which lend support to the fact that the organism associated with the contig in question is more related to B than to A.
Now, before I go and use N as a guideline in the rest of my blast searches, what does it actually mean? Instinctively I’d assume that a higher N is worse, because ‘better’ match would just have one very large High Scoring Pair, while a ‘worse’ match might have more HSPs for the same area, with mismatches inbetween them. But surely this isn’t the case…
Help would be appreciated!
Get help from others!
Recent Questions
Recent Answers
© 2024 TransWikia.com. All rights reserved. Sites we Love: PCI Database, UKBizDB, Menu Kuliner, Sharing RPP